<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>MotomaSTYLE</title>
		<link>http://motomastyle.com/home/</link>
		

		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Motoma' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_46</link>
			<description>Glad you appreciated the article Chuck!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:21:23 -0500</pubDate>
			<author>Motoma</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_46</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Chuck' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_45</link>
			<description>Offensive or stupid...no. Genious...yes. Thank you.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:56:25 -0500</pubDate>
			<author>Chuck</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_45</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Motoma' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_43</link>
			<description>You're right /dev/kev, neither losetup nor mdadm need partitioned devices in order to do their work.

Thank you for the correction!
Motoma</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:16:12 -0500</pubDate>
			<author>Motoma</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_43</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by '/dev/kev' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_42</link>
			<description>Surely the fdisk partitioning of the files is unnecessary?  Just use losetup without any offset to get loopback devices that can be fed to mdadm...  eg. something like

dd of=nfsmountpoint/image bs=1024 count=0 seek=1M
dd of=smbmountpoint/image bs=1024 count=0 seek=1M
losetup -f nfsmountpoint/image
losetup -f smbmountpoint/image
mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l1 -n2 /dev/loop{0,1}
mke2fs /dev/md0
mount /dev/md0 /mnt/tmp
</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:08:49 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>/dev/kev</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_42</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Motoma' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_35</link>
			<description>Glad to hear it tdowg1. If you have any questions regarding this, feel free to email me (motoma at gmail).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:00:16 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>Motoma</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_35</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'tdowg1' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_34</link>
			<description>Thanks--By seeing what the set of cmds+operations are to use, you helped me to create my first file-based/backed raid array! (I didn't impelement the nfs or smb part... )
......sweeeeeeeeeeeet....</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:17:06 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>tdowg1</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_34</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Michael' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_8</link>
			<description>This is the first step-by-step discussion I have found about how to set up network RAID. I am trying to do this for an iSCSI SAN I am creating. Being a linux newbie I am unsure about how to apply your solution to my problem. Currently, I have two CentOS servers running iSCSI acting as initiators and two storage boxes running iSCSI target. Ideally, there would be n storage boxes and using network RAID only n-1 boxes would be required for the data to stay available. I have successfully allowed both storage boxes to appear as disks via iSCSI on both the servers, now I have to use software RAID to make one network RAID device which I will then use inside GFS. It seems you are building a RAID device using files &quot;masquerading&quot; as disks, but I have iSCSI disks so should I create files that use all the dive space on my iSCSI disks and follow your steps or can I shortcut these steps as I have disks available? I intend to do some research to better understand what you are doing, but I thought there was no harm in asking. Thanks in advance for any help you can give.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:16:44 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>Michael</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_8</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by ' ' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_7</link>
			<description>Is there a benchmark or something to see how well it performs?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:15:43 -0400</pubDate>
			<author> </author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_7</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'chrisd' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_6</link>
			<description>Man, this is sweet, I've got a bunch of crap machines laying around and now I can use them to provide redundancy via a network RAID setup.

Thanks for the great article!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:15:29 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>chrisd</author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_6</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by ' ' on Network RAID Storage: Proof of Concept</title>
			<link>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_5</link>
			<description>Hi
I have realized the same concept with iSCSI protocol.

The last step is put the softraid under heartbeat control to have a fault tolerant system.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:58 -0400</pubDate>
			<author> </author>
			<guid>http://motomastyle.com/network-raid-storage-proof-of-concept/#PageComment_5</guid>
		</item>
		

	</channel>
</rss>
